From management to different leadership styles: A guide for 21st-century leaders
Leadership styles are the different ways a leader manages a team and makes decisions. Effective leaders can flexibly combine a variety of leadership styles based on the organizational context.
The most important contemporary leadership styles are transformational, servant, authentic, coaching, and situational leadership. Each emphasizes different aspects of management: vision, people development, interpersonal relationships, or operational effectiveness.
There's no one-size-fits-all leadership model. Depending on the situation, team, and company culture, leaders employ different management styles. Some focus on vision and change, others on relationships and on people development.
You may not realize that the term "leadership" appeared in a business context only in 1978. Before that, people talked about management styles.
This article discusses the development of management theories from the mid-19th century to today.
You'll also find a complete guide to the most important leadership styles shaping modern organizations. You'll learn:
What are the most important leadership models?
When to use particular leadership styles?
How to choose the style for a specific situation?
Which approaches work best in the 21st century?
This guide is part of the "Leadership – Empowerment Coaching Krakow" knowledge cluster.
What is the difference between management and leadership?
Management focuses on processes and execution (“doing things right”), while leadership is about vision, relationships, and inspiring people (“doing the right things”).
Definition:
"Management focuses on processes, structure, planning, and achieving operational goals, while leadership focuses on inspiring people, setting vision, and implementing change. In short, management ensures efficient goal execution, while leadership provides direction and focuses on people."
How have leadership styles evolved throughout the history of management?
The history of management theory reflects changing understanding of the leader's role in an organization.
Early theories were dominated by the belief that a supervisor should primarily control the work process and make decisions. These models arose during the industrialization era, when enterprises resembled hierarchical production structures.
In the mid-20th century, however, it was recognized that work effectiveness depended not only on processes and structures but also on interpersonal relationships. Behavioral research led to new concepts, such as transformational and situational leadership.
Today, leadership is increasingly understood as the ability to create a work environment that fosters collaboration, creativity, and human development. Contemporary approaches to leadership emphasize employee autonomy and the need to develop empathy and self-awareness.
The table below summarizes the most important periods in the history of thinking about management and leading people:
Theory | Assumption | Key Names / Important Dates |
Great Man Theory / Trait Theory (19th century – 1940s) | True leaders are born, not made. Unique traits of outstanding individuals (e.g., Julius Caesar, Napoleon, Lincoln, Gandhi) were studied (intelligence, charisma). | Developed in the 19th century, the Great Man theory evolved into the Trait Theory in the early 20th century, which in turn was abandoned by 1950. |
Behavioral Theories (1930s–1950s) | Leadership is a set of learned behaviors. Two dimensions considered: attitudes toward tasks and toward people. | Kurt Lewin, Ronald Lippitt, and Ralph White (distinguishing three basic leadership styles, 1939). |
Situational and contingent theories (1960s–1970s) | Effectiveness depends on matching the style to the given situation (context). | Fred Fiedler (conditional model). Paul Hersey and Kenneth Blanchard (situational team management style, 1969). |
Transformational theories (1970s–1990s) | A leader inspires, transforms, and motivates his subordinates to go beyond their own interests. | James MacGregor Burns (distinguishing "management" from "leadership", 1978). Bernard M. Bass (extension of Burns' theory, 1985). Transactional management vs. transformational leadership (1990). |
Modern theories (20th century - present) | Strengthening the role of team members, viewing the company as a system, increasing the importance of relationships and empathy. Recognizing the growing complexity of the business environment. Taking into account the latest discoveries in neuroscience. | Many new concepts: shared, collaborative, collective, servant, relational, inclusive, neuroleadership. In 2000, Daniel Goleman published his management theory, in which he distinguished 6 leadership styles (democratic, affiliative, visionary, coaching, command, process). |
What are the 3 basic management styles?
A pioneer in research on management theory was the American psychologist Kurt Lewin. In the late 1930s, he, along with Ronald Lippitt and Ralph White, conducted groundbreaking research that became the foundation for many subsequent theories and practices in employee management.
In the results of research published in 1939, he distinguished three basic styles of team management:
Autocratic.
Democratic.
Liberal.
They differ in the degree of employee involvement in the decision-making process and the extent of supervisory control. Each has its unique characteristics and applications in different contexts.
How did this concept contribute to the further development of management thinking?
This was the first crucial milestone in the development of people management models. These three "basic styles" later informed the development of subsequent styles, such as:
persuasive,
paternalistic,
consultative,
transformational,
visionary,
delegation.
In the following paragraphs, we present detailed definitions.
Autocratic management style (directive).
The autocratic style is an approach in which the manager makes decisions independently, without involving team members in the decision-making process. In this model, the leader has complete control over the team's activities, and orders are usually issued unambiguously and without question.
This approach can be effective in crisis situations where quick decision-making is crucial. However, it can also frustrate employees who feel out of the strategy and solution-building process. In the long run, this may impact team morale and commitment to achieving organizational goals.
Democratic management style (participatory).
By adopting a democratic style, a leader encourages team members to participate in decision-making, which fosters creativity and innovation. In this case, the leader acts as a facilitator, supporting discussion and the ideas exchange.
This approach may improve understanding of company goals and increase motivation. Employees feel more valued, which increases job satisfaction and better performance. However, involving the team can slow down decision-making, which can be detrimental in some situations.
Liberal management style (laissez-faire).
The liberal style (also called laissez-faire) is the opposite of autocracy and represents the most relaxed approach. The French term "laissez-faire" means "leave it alone." The manager adopts a withdrawn attitude and gives each team member considerable freedom to make decisions and complete tasks. They act as an observer, intervening only in crisis situations or when absolutely necessary.
This can foster creativity but requires a high degree of employee maturity.
Persuasive style.
The persuasive style is a variation of autocratic management. Managers still make all the decisions, but they take the time to explain their reasoning. This ensures that employees understand how decisions are made, even if they have no input.
Paternalistic style.
The paternalistic style is another form of autocratic management — this time focused on care. Managers still make decisions, but they do so with the entire group's best interests in mind. Although this model isn't collaborative, employees are encouraged to share their thoughts and are assured the manager will listen, even if not implement every idea.
Consultative style.
The consultative style is a more practical version of the democratic model. Managers regularly ask people for their opinions and treat decision-making as a collaborative process. Unlike autocrats, they rarely make decisions solely. Instead, they focus on collaboration, feedback, and continuous improvement.
Visionary style.
The visionary style is a kind of liberal approach. It focuses less on day-to-day tasks and more on uniting everyone around a shared vision. Visionary leaders inspire and motivate by showing direction. They guide by clearly demonstrating where the team is headed and why it matters.
Delegation style.
The delegative style is a more structured version of liberal management. It focuses on assigning tasks. Managers delegate work, step back, and then return at the end to review the results. They don't participate in the execution. There is no real-time coaching or feedback during the project. It is a cycle of assigning tasks, stepping back, and evaluation.
When did the Blanchard Model appear, and what was its innovation?
This concept was created in the 1960s by Paul Hersey and Ken Blanchard. It was another milestone. Its innovation over preceding models was a third important element.
The predecessors took into account two dimensions:
Focus on the task.
Focus on people.
Blanchard and Hersey introduced situational context and argued that the approach's effectiveness depends on the situation. This model assumes there is no single, universal leadership style.
A situational leader should adapt his or her behavior to:
The nature of the task.
The stage of employee readiness in relation to a specific task, which in turn consists of:
employee competence level,
level of commitment.
What is the SSLII Matrix?
The four levels of employee readiness correspond to the four corresponding management styles S1, S2, S3, and S4:
S1 - Directive.
S2 - Coaching.
S3 - Supporting.
S4 - Delegating.
They below diagram is called the SLII (Situational Leadership II) matrix and demonstrates them in a graphical form:
On this occasion, it is worth mentioning a few words about the name of the S2 leadership style.
In the creators' native language, it was defined as "Coaching Style." But this time, we're not dealing with a coaching management style based on asking questions. In Blanchard's approach, the boss acts like an experienced sports team coach who trains their people and gives instructions.
What is leadership?
Let's define this new concept in the business world as precisely as possible.
Definition:
"Leadership is the ability to influence people so that they voluntarily engage in achieving a common goal."
Now let's move to the late 1970s, when James MacGregor Burns first distinguished "leading" from "managing".
What is leadership style?
Leadership style describes how a leader:
makes decisions,
communicates with the team,
motivates employees,
builds organizational culture.
The literature distinguishes many models. However, contemporary research indicates that effective leadership rarely relies on a single style. The best leaders develop leadership flexibility by adapting their approach to the situation.
What is transformational leadership and what makes it different?
Transformational leadership focuses on inspiring people to change and grow.
Transformational leader:
builds a vision of the future,
motivates people to overcome their own limitations,
strengthens the sense of meaning in work.
In leadership theory, it was a milestone and the first concept to use the term "leadership" instead of "management." James MacGregor Burns (1978) developed this approach, and Bernard Bass (1985) further enhanced it.
It was created as a counterweight to transactional management, in which the relationship between manager and employee is based on:
transactions (if you complete the goal, you will receive a reward),
system of rewards and punishments,
procedures and strict control of results.
In the context of the three basic forms of management, it should be treated as a development of the democratic style.
Currently, the transformational style is particularly effective in companies undergoing reorganization or operating in a dynamic environment.
The turn of the 20th and 21st centuries – Daniel Goleman and his groundbreaking work.
In 1995, Daniel Goleman published his groundbreaking book, Emotional Intelligence: Why It Can Matter More Than IQ. The book became a worldwide bestseller, introducing the concept of emotional intelligence (EQ) to the masses and emphasizing its importance in both professional and personal life.
In 1998, Goleman published his famous article in Harvard Business Review titled "What Makes a Leader?" In it, he demonstrated the crucial importance of emotional intelligence in business leadership. In 2000, he announced his management theory, in which he distinguished six leadership styles.
What was the significance of Goleman's concept?
This marks the beginning of another important period in the development of leadership models. In addition to emotional intelligence, self-awareness, relationship building, and a collaborative environment are at the forefront, followed by empathy, inclusiveness, psychological safety, and trust.
This has fueled the development of further leadership theories. It has also inspired new project management methods, such as Agile Project Management, Design Thinking, and SCRUM.
Definitions of individual leadership styles you will find in the following paragraphs.
Coaching leadership style.
The coaching leadership style involves developing employee potential through:
asking questions,
active listening,
supporting independence.
In this model, the leader doesn't provide ready-made answers and helps employees find their own solutions. This approach is particularly effective in learning organizations.
Authentic leadership.
Authentic leadership is based on:
consistency of personal values,
self-awareness,
transparency.
An authentic leader builds trust through consistent and honest relationships.
Values-based leadership.
Values-based leadership focuses on making decisions and leading a team based on external moral principles and organizational values.
Servant leadership.
Servant leadership assumes a supervisor's role is primarily to serve people and support their development.
Servant Leader:
focuses on the needs of the team,
helps employees develop their competencies,
builds a culture of cooperation.
Robert K. Greenleaf popularized this concept, and today it is one of the most respected leadership models in knowledge-based environments.
Relational leadership.
Relational leadership is based on building trust and open communication, followed by empathy. It focuses on nurturing relationships to motivate employees, support their development, and achieve goals together, rather than enforcing obedience through authority.
This is often combined with a servant leadership approach, where the manager supports people's development by putting their needs first.
Framing leadership.
Framing leadership is a conscious approach that recognizes the importance of situational context and emphasizes the leader's responsibility for creating its framework. The ability to "reframe" a given situation increases psychological safety and fosters employee engagement.
Neuroleadership.
Neuroleadership uses knowledge from neuroscience to better understand:
motivation,
emotional reactions,
process of making choices.
Brain research helps business leaders create work environments that foster collaboration and creativity.
Why does leadership style matter?
The primary leadership style directly influences:
employee engagement,
level of trust in the organization,
company culture,
team effectiveness.
Research shows the behavior of people in managerial positions has a huge impact on the working atmosphere and long-term business results.
How does leadership style affect employee engagement?
Gallup research indicates that leadership quality is one of the most important factors influencing employee engagement.
Bosses who can inspire, support people's development, and build a sense of purpose in their work often observe higher motivation in their teams.
In turn, an approach based solely on control and hierarchy limits freedom of action and often leads to decreased motivation and increased employee turnover.
How does leadership style influence organizational culture?
Organizational culture largely reflects the way leaders operate. When they promote openness, collaboration, and trust, these values begin to permeate the entire company.
Leadership style defines decision-making ownership, influences workplace communication and relationships, and affects employees' willingness to work. Research confirms that in companies committed to higher levels of collaboration and innovation, coaching and servant leadership styles perform best.
In turn, an autocratic management style (in which superiors want full control over decisions) leads to a culture of fear and risk avoidance.
Why do modern organizations need different styles?
21st-century organizations operate in a much more dynamic environment than in the past. Globalization, technological advancement, and changing employee expectations mean that no single style can meet all challenges.
In practice, this means leaders should be able to switch approaches depending on the situation.
For example, during a transformation, a democratic leadership style may be needed, whereas in situations requiring quick decisions, you may choose a more directive one.
The most effective leaders understand that leadership is a dynamic process. Personal style is not a fixed personality trait. It is a set of competencies to develop.
What leader competencies support effective leadership?
Modern leadership assumes that leaders need competencies to manage both processes and relationships effectively.
The most important competencies of a leader include:
strategic thinking,
self-awareness,
emotional intelligence,
interpersonal communication,
ability to build trust.
Developing these competencies is crucial for supervisors who want to use different leadership styles effectively.
How to develop your own leadership style?
Developing your leadership style requires reflection and continuous learning. It is a process.
The first step is understanding your strengths and weaknesses. Leaders often use tools like coaching, mentoring, and 360-degree feedback.
The second step is experimentation with various styles in practice. This helps leaders tailor their approach to their team and the organization's needs.
How is the future of work changing leadership styles?
The key factors changing leaders' role in organizations are modern technologies' dynamic development, digital transformation, remote work, and the growing importance of creativity
Leadership styles based on collaboration, empathy, and developing people's potential are becoming increasingly important. Leaders of the future will increasingly become mentors and architects of the workplace.
In the context of AI, a clear division of roles between humans and artificial intelligence, followed by a seamless workflow that integrates these two elements, becomes increasingly important.
📌 Summary: The evolution of the team manager role into the modern leader.
Most important things to remember:
The history of management and leadership models dates back to the mid-19th century.
Leadership is not the same as managing or directing people.
The three basic management styles (autocratic, democratic, laissez-faire) published in 1939 became the basis for subsequent models of people management and leadership styles.
James MacGregor Burns has made a key distinction between management and leadership. He contrasted transactional management with the new transformational leadership style.
There is no single best style. Effective leaders combine different leadership models.
Leadership quality is a key factor influencing team engagement and shaping organizational culture.
FAQs.
Here are the answers to the most frequently asked questions in management and leadership.
What is 3C in traditional management style?
In the traditional management approach, the 3Cs are: commanding, coordinating, and controlling. This concept is driven by power, authority, commands, and detailed instructions.
What is 3W in modern leadership?
The 3W rule stands for: requiring, supporting, and linking actions through feedback. The foundations of this philosophy are: creating a vision, providing information, delegating authority and responsibility, involving employees in management, and providing support and consultation.
What are the most important contemporary leadership styles?
The most important contemporary leadership styles include: transformational, situational, servant, coaching, and authentic leadership.
Which leadership style produces the best results?
There is no single best style. The most effective leaders flexibly adapt their approach to the team's situation and the company's strategic goals.
What are the most important competencies of a 21st-century leader?
Strategic thinking, emotional intelligence, empathy, building trust, and self-awareness are among the most important competencies of modern leaders.
How is authentic leadership different from values-based leadership?
Authentic leadership stems from the leader's internal compass, self-awareness, and experiences (authenticity). Values-based leadership stems from specific, often company-defined principles (integrity, respect, innovation). Authenticity focuses on "who am I?" (internal), while a values-based approach focuses on "what do I represent?" (external code).
How do you choose the right leadership style? Can you combine them?
No single ideal leadership style exists. The most effective leaders combine different approaches and adapt them to the situational needs.
The key is to develop:
leader's self-awareness,
empathy,
leadership flexibility.
What mistakes do leaders make when choosing their leadership style?
One of the most common mistakes is believing in a single universal style that will work in every situation.
In practice, this approach can lead to problems in managing people. Leaders who adhere to a single operating model often struggle to adapt to changing conditions.
Other key mistakes are ignoring the broader business context and employee needs.
Sources:
Here are the sources used to write this article:
https://bmjleader.bmj.com/content/5/1/3
https://leadersexcellence.com/the-evolution-of-leadership/
https://blogs.ncl.ac.uk/elcblog/2025/04/14/selecting-golemans-leadership-styles/
https://www.empowerment-coaching.com/post/servant-leadership-przywodztwo-sluzebne-czym-jest-i-skad-pochodzi
https://www.regent.edu/journal/journal-of-virtues-leadership/character-and-servant-leadership-ten-characteristics-of-effective-caring-leaders/
See related content:
How to be a good leader? Activate your vulnerability!
Is your authority at work healthy?
What is a holistic approach to humanity?
About the author:
Ryszard Skarbek is a certified business coach, mentor, and HR advisor. He has over 30 years of professional experience, including 22 years in an international corporation operating on six continents.
As a coach and mentor, Ryszard works mainly with middle and senior managers and business owners.
His main specializations are 21st-century leadership, interpersonal communication, self-awareness, HR, IT, and Project Management.
Comments